[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: porting with autotools
From: |
Steffen Dettmer |
Subject: |
Re: porting with autotools |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:34:25 +0200 |
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Reuben Hawkins <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm porting a large Windows toolkit to Linux, OSX, etc. Is there a
> tool which will walk my directory structure outputting Makefile.am in
> each directory where needed?
I'd recommend to consider alternatives to the `one Makefile.am per
direcory' approach in favor of fewer makefiles, maybe only one
per component. As far as I know automake fully supports this.
Advantages (including less automake time, less make traversing
time, better and direct dependency tracking possible, make can
optimize better, especially in parallel builds with -j).
oki,
Steffen
- porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/25
- Re: porting with autotools, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/26
- Re: porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/26
- Re: porting with autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/27
- Re: porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/27
- Re: porting with autotools, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/28
- Re: porting with autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/28
- Re: porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/30
- Re: porting with autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/30
- Re: porting with autotools, NightStrike, 2010/08/31
Re: porting with autotools,
Steffen Dettmer <=