[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: porting with autotools
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: porting with autotools |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:09:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) |
Hello Reuben,
* Reuben Hawkins wrote on Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:00:02PM CEST:
> > Now, if you are still interested in contributing, and maybe in perl
> > rather than C, then I will send you the details off-list.
> Yes, I'm interested in contributing, but not in Perl. It'll have to
> be C code. I'll check back with you in a few weeks when I feel the
> code is ready.
Adding tool in a compiled language for this purpose doesn't make a lot
of sense for Autotools; it would needlessly complicate things, and
probably make the code size a lot bigger. If you don't want to
reconsider this, we can still profit from your prototype implementation
by looking at it and translating it (though I don't think I've ever
translated from C to Perl before ;-)
But maybe one of the other maintainers likes this idea better ...
Cheers,
Ralf
- porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/25
- Re: porting with autotools, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/26
- Re: porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/26
- Re: porting with autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/27
- Re: porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/27
- Re: porting with autotools, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/28
- Re: porting with autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/28
- Re: porting with autotools, Reuben Hawkins, 2010/08/30
- Re: porting with autotools,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: porting with autotools, NightStrike, 2010/08/31
Re: porting with autotools, Steffen Dettmer, 2010/08/27