[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 0/5] Small simplification to suffix rules suppo
|
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 0/5] Small simplification to suffix rules support, and added coverage |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2012 11:09:39 +0200 |
On 05/25/2012 10:02 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Le 24 mai 2012 à 09:41, Stefano Lattarini a écrit :
>
>> I was actually hoping these would have been part of a larger cleanup, but
>> that didn't work out as expected. Still, I think this patches would make
>> a nice addition.
>>
>> OK to apply? I will push by tomorrow if there is no objection.
>
> Good to go.
>
Thanks, pushed.
Regards,
Stefano
- [Automake-NG] [PATCH 0/5] Small simplification to suffix rules support, and added coverage, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/24
- [Automake-NG] [PATCH 1/5] [ng] coverage: custom pre-processes headers in prog_SOURCES, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/24
- [Automake-NG] [PATCH 3/5] [ng] coverage: pure languages doesn't bring in C support, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/24
- [Automake-NG] [PATCH 4/5] [ng] coverage: mixing Fortran and C++, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/24
- [Automake-NG] [PATCH 2/5] [ng] rule: get rid of $KNOWN_EXTENSIONS_PATTERN, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/24
- [Automake-NG] [PATCH 5/5] [ng] rule, lang: get rid of 'suffix_rules_count', simplify logic, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/24
- Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 0/5] Small simplification to suffix rules support, and added coverage, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/25
- Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 0/5] Small simplification to suffix rules support, and added coverage,
Stefano Lattarini <=