[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCH support
From: |
Olaf van der Spek |
Subject: |
Re: PCH support |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:10:12 +0100 |
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Stefano Lattarini
<address@hidden> wrote:
> First, I know basically nothing about PCH, and it seems to me that it is not
> a feature many users would require or employ.
Why not? It can drastically reduce build times of C++ projects. I have
little experience with C projects, but I assume it speeds those up as
well.
Conceptually, it's also simple to implement (for someone with automake
knowledge).
> Second, and more important: as you can easily see, the Automake bug tracker
> is full of bug reports with higher precedence, and of feature requests with
> potentially more widespread user bases.
Do automake users not care about build times?
--
Olaf
- Re: PCH support, (continued)
- Re: PCH support, Dave Hart, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Miles Bader, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Miles Bader, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Miles Bader, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/23
Re: PCH support,
Olaf van der Spek <=