[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCH support
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: PCH support |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:20:44 +0900 |
Dave Hart <address@hidden> writes:
> True, but most C/C++ #includes orders of magnitudes more lines than
> they contain themselves, so assuming the source code is rearranged to
> have a "precomp.h" containing the bulk of #includes, the compile will
> be notably faster.
Faster enough to be worth the annoyance for the developer of twisting
his source code to fit the "pch style" (which seems notably uglier)?
Machines are very fast these days, and even using tons of big headers,
C++ parsing doesn't seem such a big deal as it maybe used to.
[AFAICT, slow compilation seems far more often connected with
optimization than parsing.]
-Miles
--
Barometer, n. An ingenious instrument which indicates what kind of weather we
are having.
- PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Warren Young, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Dave Hart, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/23
- Re: PCH support,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Miles Bader, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Miles Bader, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/25
- Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/23
Re: PCH support, Olaf van der Spek, 2011/12/23