avr-chat
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-chat] ?Optimized eeprom?


From: Daniel O'Connor
Subject: Re: [avr-chat] ?Optimized eeprom?
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 09:46:34 +0930
User-agent: KMail/1.9.3

On Friday 16 June 2006 23:26, Bob Paddock wrote:
> > The only reliable, repeatable and maintainable (i.e., without manually
> > specifying each address) way to get consistent addresses is to put all
> > your eeprom data into a single struct.  It's best to make sure that any
> > padding involved is explicit (using the "-wpadded" warning).

I don't have the original email so I'm replying to this reply..
WRT packing you can tell GCC to not pack a particular data structure like so..
typedef struct _foo_t {
        int     a;
        char    b;
        float   c;
} __attribute__ ((packed)) foo_t;

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

Attachment: pgphdcMH5Tx2G.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]