RE: [avr-chat] Help

[Matt.Vandewerken]

I think the only difference between the 89S series and the AVR's from an
ISP POV is that the 89S has an inverted reset (from a long long ago
memory). 

Cheers,
--
Matt van de Werken
Electronics Engineer
Mining Geoscience, CSIRO Exploration & Mining
1 Technology Ct   Pullenvale   QLD   4069
P: 07 3327 4142  F: 07 3327 4455  M: 0400 538 608
E: address@hidden

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Friday, 19 September 2008 5:43 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Help

As Weddington, Eric wrote:

> > The STK500 could support that chip, but nobody had enough
> > motivation so far to add support to AVRDUDE for that.

> But then we'd have to change the name to AVR8051DUDE, or
> 8051AVRDUDE, or 80AVR51DUDE, or somesuch. Totally unwieldly in the
> mouth.

:-)

Well, as that's about the only on-AVR chip supported by the STK500
(for hysterical raisins), if someone was really eager to contribute
the code, I think I'd accept it.  There's a good guarantee this
doesn't proliferate anyway. ;-)

(I guess adding Xmega support is overall more work than adding AT89S5x
support...)

> But if we then also add support for ARM, and AVR32, it becomes
> generic enough we could just simply call it DUDE. Very
> surfer/California-ish kinda thing. Certain zen quality to it. Yeah,
> like, y'know?

Hey, the irony detector here just triggered.  Was that your posting
that might have triggered it, Eric? :-)

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-chat mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat