Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-as and the dot "."

[Daniel Kruszyna]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> > 
> > .word link
> > .set link,.-2
> 
> Why not
> 
>       .word   . - 2
> 
> ?

I want the link to point to the header of the
previous definition (basically subroutine),
which is not a fixed distance away.

My idea was to set the link symbol to the location of
the current header, and then use it when I define the
next header.  But I was counting on link being able
to have more than one value, like a variable.

-- Daniel