Re: [avr-gcc-list] Building equivalent of WinAVR on Linux

[Joerg Wunsch]

"Rolf Ebert" <address@hidden> wrote:

> If binary releases of the toolchain are provided, it is useful (or
> even necessary for some) to have them *synchronized*.

That's well beyond the scope of any existing project.  If someone
needs this, they need to run their own project, or contribute enough
man power to one of the existing projects (like WinAVR) to extend it
appropriately.

While I do my best to keep the toolchain up-to-date for FreeBSD (so
it's probably one of the most suitable systems for AVR development
`out-of-the-box'), I wouldn't even remotely think of really
synchronizing my effort to WinAVR.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)