Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: WinAVR 20050214 (gcc 3.4.3) and optimizer bug.

[E. Weddington]

Larry Barello wrote:

> So, this is all facinating reading, but what, if anything, is a NULL pointer
> in the AVR context?  Address 0 is certainly valid.  Or is it simply
> convention that 0 is "null".
To the best of my knowledge, a NULL pointer in the AVR context is 0. And 
yes, that is simply a convention. But it is a very widespread 
convention; there aren't many platforms around that define NULL as 
something other than 0, though it is allowed in the language.

Eric