Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!

[Royce Pereira]

Hi,

On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:26:11 +0530, Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>  
wrote:

> > > http://www.sax.de/~joerg/avr-libc-user-manual/group__avr__interrupts.html
>
> > Yep, I find it a lot better/clearer :-)
>
> Thanks for the feedback, I committed the new description to CVS.

Just asking - why not have the 2nd case i.e SIG_XXX(void) convention for  
both cases - one case with the 'interrupt' attribute and one without?  
Unless, of course, there are some real problems which I'm ignorant about.

Thanks,
--Royce.


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/