[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!
|
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?! |
|
Date: |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 07:07:34 +0200 (MET DST) |
Col <address@hidden> wrote:
> Why not depreciate both of them and start with something new?
Because there's no need to annoy all those users of SIGNAL() out there
(which would effectively be all AVR-GCC/avr-libc users).
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Vincent Trouilliez, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04