Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT Generic C question

[Mike Murphree]

Alexandru Csete said:

> Please go and see the link http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/s3.html
> posted by Russell. It makes it perfectly clear that there is no
> expected behaviour in this situation. There is even an equivalent
> example where
>
> int i = 3;
> i = i++;
>
> gave the values 3, 4 and 7 - each of them equally correct ;-)


If writing software for a safety critical system which I occasionally do,
I expect my compiler not to do "Bad Things"(TM) and it certainly violates
POLA as well.  Whether or not it is undefined behavior in the C standard
makes little difference to me...

Mike