Re: [avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3

avr-gcc-list


Georg-Johann Lay wrote:

Maybe some of
-fno-inline-small-function
-fno-split-wide-types
-fno-move-loop-invariants

Thanks, it is working, code generated by 4.3.3 dramatically reduced.Checked asm output, loop codes generated by 4.3.3 still bigger than 4.0.3.


--
Kang Tin Lai

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3, Kang Tin LAI, 2009/04/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3, Georg-Johann Lay, 2009/04/10
- Message not available
  - Re: [avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3, Kang Tin LAI <=