[avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3

avr-gcc-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3

From:	Kang Tin LAI
Subject:	[avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3
Date:	Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:13:29 +0800
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213)

Hi,

My old code (a bootloader) compiled with 4.0.3 + avr-libc 1.4.4 the codesize is 1068 bytes, but same code compiled with 4.3.3 + avr-libc 1.6.6the code size is 1332 bytes!

Optimization option is -Os, boot_page_xxx and boot_rww_xxx libraryfunctions are called only.


Any body here knows what happened?

Regards.
--
--
Kang Tin Lai

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3, Kang Tin LAI <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3, Georg-Johann Lay, 2009/04/10
- Message not available
  - Re: [avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3, Kang Tin LAI, 2009/04/15

Prev by Date: Re: [avr-gcc-list] ISR function name aliasing?
Next by Date: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3
Previous by thread: [avr-gcc-list] when is it safe to use -mtiny-stack
Next by thread: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Code size 4.0.3 vs 4.3.3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread