[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] malloc bug ?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] malloc bug ? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:43:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
As daniel_laptop wrote:
> My question is, is __heap_start used in anything other than malloc.c
Nope, __heap_start and __heap_end are just there so the application
can tune where malloc() is going to allocate the dynamic memory.
> Will att. file work for all avr-libc functions (only changing
> __malloc_heap_start)
I would do it using linker directives (--defsym), this saves you from
the trouble of doing it at run-time. Apart from that, at a first
glance, it looks OK. Just give it a try and see if it works.
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] malloc bug ?, (continued)
- [avr-libc-dev] testsuite, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/09/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] testsuite, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] testsuite, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/09/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] testsuite, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] testsuite, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/09/09
Re: [avr-libc-dev] malloc bug ?, daniel_laptop, 2002/09/08
Re: [avr-libc-dev] malloc bug ?, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/09/08