Re: [avr-libc-dev] timer.h

[E. Weddington]

On 30 Sep 2002 at 9:53, Theodore A. Roth wrote:

> I like the sound of this. Give the user a documented example/reference
> implementation in the dox examples. Explain the pros, cons and gotchas
> of using it. With this approach, we take a lower priority stance than
> the core library (interfaces like this might bit rot as new devices
> come out, but I'd rather have example bit rot than core bit rot), we
> still add value (they can cut/paste if they want) and we reduce bloat
> in the core lib (always a good thing).

Sounds good.

> 
> BTW: I'm not too excited about the existing examples in doc/examples.
> Those files look a bit random and disconnected. Personally, I think
> example should be in it's own subdirectory and completely self
> contained. See the (soon to be committed) doc/examples/demo project
> for a reference. Also, if all the examples are built at compile time,
> we _might_ be able use them for part of test system that Joerg
> discussed previously.

Code reuse! :-)

Eric