RE: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:00 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
> 
> As Rich Teer wrote:
> 
> > There's another (I'd argue, better) alternative: the CDDL.
> > Certianly worth evaluating...
> 
> Can you elaborate on "better"?

> . much more license text to worry about than the relatively simple
>   BSD license

This one bothers me the most. From a first glance, the CDDL contains a
lot of legalese. Almost need a lawyer to interpret. Constrast that with
the BSD license which is simpler and more straightforward for
non-lawyers to understand.