Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Weddington, Eric wrote:

> Some concerns:
> 
> Simulate: regression/bug-22828.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 24
> Simulate: regression/bug-22828.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 24

Strange enough, for me this only fails for the AT90S8515 simulation,
but works for the ATmega128 simulation.  This is independent of the
compiler used (GCC 4.2.2 or 4.3.1).

The test case performs an EEPROM block read, so it might be related to
the other EEPROM failures.

> Simulate: math/isinf-01.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> Simulate: math/isinf-01.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> 
> Simulate: math/modf-np.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 18
> Simulate: math/modf-np.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 18
> 
> Simulate: math/signbit-01.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 2
> Simulate: math/signbit-01.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 2

I see these as well when compiling with GCC 4.3.x, while with GCC
4.2.1, only signbit-01.c fails.  Maybe Dmitry can shed some light onto
that?

> Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s2313 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s4414 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega8 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega16 ... *** simulate failed: 22

That could perhaps be an issue with the simulator itself.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)