[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:59:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
As Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> > 4. bug-22828 and other EEPROM tests: seems, this is a
> > Simulavr problem. The 0.1.2.1 version is correct. I will
> > look this in details.
>
> As time permits, I'll also look into that.
Strange, another site, different compilers but the same version of
simulavr:
% ./runtest.sh avr/eeprom-1.c
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 81
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s2313 ... *** simulate failed: 81
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s4414 ... *** simulate failed: 81
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 81
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega8 ... *** simulate failed: 81
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega16 ... *** simulate failed: 81
OK, line 81 has a comment saying that GCC 4.2.2 generates incorrect
code there, and this site is (currently) running exactly that version.
So, let's try different compilers:
% ./runtest.sh -g avr-gcc-4.3.2 avr/eeprom-1.c
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega128 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s2313 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s4414 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s8515 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega8 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega16 ... OK
-------
Done. Number of operated files: 1
Success.
% ./runtest.sh -g avr-gcc-4.2.4 avr/eeprom-1.c
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega128 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s2313 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s4414 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s8515 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega8 ... OK
Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega16 ... OK
-------
Done. Number of operated files: 1
Success.
Thinking a little more about it, on that site, I'm using a privately
compiled version of simulavr below my $HOME (basically the current
state from CVS), while at home, I've been using the version installed
in the system, which is slightly older.
Bottom line: I think the current simulavr works fine here. I'll
release another upgrade version then.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Dmitry K., 2009/03/04
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Dmitry K., 2009/03/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Dmitry K., 2009/03/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Test results, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/06