Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names

[Frédéric Nadeau]

Hi there,

I'm working on the duplicate thing and I'm facing a critical issue. It
has been decided that we should not care mutch if pins where active
low or active high(such as SS, RD, WR, etc).

http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc1477.pdf
See page 2 PB0 and PB1

This seems to be as a legitimate duplicate. This will end up in the
following as a duplicate entry in the pin define section:
#define OC1A_DDR DDRB

Any opinion for a work around, better idea?

Thanks.

Sorry M. Weddington for the PV.

2009/4/7 Weddington, Eric <address@hidden>:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>> address@hidden
>> [mailto:address@hidden
>> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:22 AM
>> To: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I'm back from travel, I'll be looking into those thing shortly.
>>
>> As for notifying Atmel of mistake/errors/inconsistencies in XML files
>> I thing it will be harder than what you make it sound like. Using the
>> librairy, we load the XML in ram as an object tree. When I walk the
>> tree, I can find errors but I cannot relate back to the XML line.
>
> Hmm. For now, don't worry about trying to find errors. I'll see what I can do 
> with your (future) updated patch.
>