[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:41:33 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:31 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm working on the duplicate thing and I'm facing a critical issue. It
> has been decided that we should not care mutch if pins where active
> low or active high(such as SS, RD, WR, etc).
>
> http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc1477.pdf
> See page 2 PB0 and PB1
>
> This seems to be as a legitimate duplicate. This will end up in the
> following as a duplicate entry in the pin define section:
> #define OC1A_DDR DDRB
>
> Any opinion for a work around, better idea?
*sigh*
Unfortunately, I don't have a better idea. It looks like that we will have to
take into account inverted signals in the naming scheme. (As a side note, I
really wish the XML files were more consistent. It looks like the ATtiny26.xml
file has yet another way to do the pin mappings.)
I'm open to ideas on a naming scheme.
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/01
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/04/07
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/04/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Bob Paddock, 2009/04/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/04/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/04/14
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/14