Re: [Axiom-developer] Debugging Boot

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Vanuxem Gregory <address@hidden> writes:

| Le dimanche 26 novembre 2006 à 21:37 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
| > "Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:
| > 
| > | On November 26, 2006 2:58 PM Vanuxem Gregory wrote:
| > | > ...
| > | > > On November 26, 2006 10:06 AM Gaby asked:
| > | > > > 
| > | > > > What happens if you just say:
| > | > > > 
| > | > > >    )lisp (boottran::boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot")
| > | > > > 
| > | > > > ?
| > | > > >
| > | > > 
| > | > > Hmmm...
| > | > >  
| > | > > (1) -> )lisp (boottran::boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot")
| > | > > 
| > | > >    >> System error:
| > | > >    The function BOOTTRAN::BOOT is undefined.
| > | > 
| > | > I think Gaby wanted to say:
| > | > 
| > | >  )lisp (boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot")
| > | > 
| > | 
| > | So why not just say what it is supposed to do instead of
| > | making me "experiment"? <sigh>
| > 
| > ???
| > 
| > I did mean boottran::boot, as I intended boot from package boottran
| > which is documented (src/boot/ptyout.boot) as
| > 
| >    -- (boot "filename") translates the file "filename.boot" to
| >    -- the common lisp file "filename.clisp", compiles it and loads
| >    -- the bbin/o file.
| 
| Sorry. I see now.

Don't be sorry.  Apparently, I made the incorrect assumption that Bill
was more knowledgeable with the system than he thinks he is.  That
exceedingly annoyed him.  Please ignore my message.

-- Gaby