[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [be] Bibledit-general Digest, Vol 55, Issue 24
From: |
David Gardner |
Subject: |
Re: [be] Bibledit-general Digest, Vol 55, Issue 24 |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:22:17 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 06:22:11PM -0700, Mark Duling wrote:
>
> I don't get this either. I've seen linking problems with stuff
> duplicated in / usr, but I can't understand why a manual install works if
> it links against all the same macports libraries, as it does when you
> install it from macports.
I don't know in mac has an equivalent to linux's ldd command (lists
dynamicly linked libraries), but that might check if there are actually
any differences. (just to be sure, I'd probably capture the output from the
ldd on the 2 programs and run diff on them).
There MUST be a difference between the 2 binaries...
Another thought.... it isn't that macports are using a different
optimisation level is it? On ARM I had a crash because GCC optimised
something important away.
David
- Re: [be] Bibledit-general Digest, Vol 55, Issue 24, Mark Duling, 2013/04/23
- Re: [be] Bibledit-general Digest, Vol 55, Issue 24,
David Gardner <=
- Re: [be] Bibledit-general Digest, Vol 55, Issue 24, Teus Benschop, 2013/04/25