Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> Couldn't this be a --yacc issue?  That is, --yacc would implement whatever 
> the Open Group says.  Without it, bison would be free to behave well and 
> consistently for both C and C++: don't execute $$ = $1 before an explicit 
> action.

Yes, something like that would make a lot of sense, but at this point
I think it should wait until after 2.2 is out.  Right now we should be
trying to reduce the possible adverse effect of newly introduced
features (and fixing bugs of course) rather than introducing new
stuff.