Re: FYI: default %printer/%destructor

[Joel E. Denny]

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> Ok, here's a less verbose alternative:
> 
>   a(name1): b c() d(@name2)
> 
> For a, the value and location are $name1 and @name2.

I meant $name1 and @name1, of course.

> For b, they are $b and @b.  
> For c, the value is declared unused.
> 
> So far, these are old ideas I've discussed at length before.  What's new 
> is that, for d, the value is also declared unused, but the location can be 
> referenced with @name2.  This last usage may not be common, but I think it 
> ought to be possible.