Re: unreachable states after conflict resolution

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> It occurs to me now that the above change might be a 
> backward-compatibility problem because it can change the number of 
> conflicts that Bison reports for existing grammars, and that can affect 
> %expect and %expect-rr.  However, I see the previous behavior as 
> incorrect.

I agree.  Let's keep the change.  Thanks for making Bison better!