Re: unreachable states after conflict resolution

[Joel E. Denny]

On Mon, 7 May 2007, Paul Eggert wrote:

> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > It occurs to me now that the above change might be a 
> > backward-compatibility problem because it can change the number of 
> > conflicts that Bison reports for existing grammars, and that can affect 
> > %expect and %expect-rr.  However, I see the previous behavior as 
> > incorrect.
> 
> I agree.  Let's keep the change.  Thanks for making Bison better!

Sounds good to me.  Thanks.