Re: [bongo-devel] Invasive refactoring: `bongo-next-object-line', et al.

[Daniel Brockman]

Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:

> I've made some pretty extensive refactorial changes to a
> bunch of primitives and all affected code.
>
> The reason for all this was to have a good way to implement
> `bongo-transpose-forward' and `bongo-transpose-backward'.
>
> I think the my code is finally in a steady state again, but I
> would like someone else to use it for a while before I apply
> the patch to the advertised development repository.

Well, Daniel Jensen just told me that I messed it up anyway
and pushed a patch that refers to a function in that branch.

So I decided to just bite the bullet and merge the branch
into the main repository.  It's not *that* invasive.

I'll just shoot down the problems as they surface.

Sorry about this,

-- 
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>