[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks
From: |
Daniel Jensen |
Subject: |
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:30:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>
>> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>>>
>>> I wonder why it's called `universal argument', though...
>>
>> I don't know, C-u is a universal argument but it cannot be /the/
>> universal argument. We should let M-& be one too. I agree that the
>> name can be more clear on what the command actually does.
>
> So each command would have to implement support for `M-&'?
No, but it's used like C-u in that it modifies how a command operates.
It's not an actual argument, so it might make sense to call it
something else.
I take back that it's not a good idea to extend it to use a prefix or
the region, I didn't really think about it. If it's not in the way,
then I don't mind. This means maybe that it should not do anything
special when there is no prefix and no region. I don't know if it is
always good to kill the marking before iterating through the lines --
can you think of examples of when it messes things up or when it helps
not to mess up?
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, (continued)
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/06
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/08
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks,
Daniel Jensen <=
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/10
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/10
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/10
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/29
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09