[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks
From: |
Daniel Jensen |
Subject: |
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:36:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>
>> No, we were talking about killing the marking.
>
> I don't know what you mean here, but maybe it is not important?
No, never mind that.
>> We should add this functionality to the command now. We can just write
>> it into the command, but I think we need the "selection" of tracks in
>> a utility function.
>
> Yes, that's probably a good idea. As for what to call this
> concept, I think `selection' is pretty good --- at least for
> internal purposes. There's already the concept of `secondary
> selection' though.
Yes. I think track selection is good for internal use.
As for the user interface, I don't think there is a need to introduce
the concept. Where it is described, no information is lost if only the
different kinds of selections are listed.
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, (continued)
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/06
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/08
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/10
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/10
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks,
Daniel Jensen <=
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/29
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09