Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?

[Matthias Andree]

On Mon, 02 Dec 2002, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:

>  David> The word "seducing" is wrong here.  As the meaning of the sentence is
>  David> not clear to me, I'm not sure what to suggest as an alternative.
>  David> Perhaps "tempting" would work.
> 
> Blush.  That's French disguised as English.  
> I really meant `attactive'.
> 
> How about
> 
>  It should be clearer now how building `bindir.h' from
>  `configure' would benefit to this example: `bindir.h' will
>  exist before you build any target, hence will not cause any
>  dependency issue.

C'est mieux. (That's better.), but remember, you don't have access to
the $(sysconfdir) like thingies in configure[.ac] as the ultimate and
"real" expansion will only take place in the Makefile.