[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?
From: |
Jirka Hanika |
Subject: |
Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression? |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:17:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
> ...
> This game can turn to be a bit dangerous if you are not careful
> enough. `bindir.$(OBJEXT): bindir.h' overwrites any rule that Automake
> may want to output to build `bindir.$(OBJEXT)'. It happens to work
> here because Automake doesn't have to output any `bindir.$(OBJEXT):'
> target, as it relies on a suffix rule instead (i.e., `.c.$(OBJEXT):').
> Always check the generated `Makefile.am' if you do this.
Hello,
I suggest checking the generated Makefile or Makefile.in instead of Makefile.am.
Jirka
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, (continued)
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/12/02
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, David Relson, 2002/12/02
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/12/02
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, Matthias Andree, 2002/12/02
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/12/02
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, Matthias Andree, 2002/12/02
- Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, David Relson, 2002/12/02
Message not available
Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?, Matthias Andree, 2002/12/02
Re: automake 1.7.1 dependency tracking regression?,
Jirka Hanika <=