[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tcpwrapper not used any more but referenced (?)
From: |
Mark . Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: tcpwrapper not used any more but referenced (?) |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 22:44:32 +0100 (MET) |
True enough - don't need it any more!
M
On 26 Mar, Martin Jost wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems, that the libwrap (tcpwrapper) support has been removed from
> cfengine. (In 2.0.0)
> (Correct me, if I'm wrong on this one; I didn't find it in the
> Changelog, but grepping on the source and Makefiles make me think so)
>
> But still configure checks for it and the docus make reference to it.
> (The docu was starting to confuse me on this, so I investigated)
>
> tcpd(.h) or tcpwrapper is mentioned in the following files, where it
> should be removed IMHO.
> (If it really isn't used anymore)
>
> ./configure
> ./configure.ac
> ./doc/cfengine-Reference.html
> ./doc/cfengine-Reference.info-7
> ./doc/cfengine-Reference.texinfo
> ./doc/cfengine-Tutorial.html
> ./doc/cfengine-Tutorial.info-5
> ./doc/cfengine-Tutorial.texinfo
> ./inputs/cfservd.conf.example
> ./src/conf.h.in
>
> It is also "mentioned" in the examples, but here to wrap services (in
> inetd.conf) with an existing tcpwrapper. So these are ok.
>
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-cfengine mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: address@hidden
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~