bug-commoncpp
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ cplusplus-Bugs-652548 ] Compilation of network.cpp fails


From: Prochnow, Christian
Subject: Re: [ cplusplus-Bugs-652548 ] Compilation of network.cpp fails
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:56:37 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

Hi,

i'm the author of network.cpp - but i dont have access to a FreeBSD machine at 
all :(. The solution sounds ok, cause all the ifreq-members are in an union 
(except ifr_name) and the returned values depend on the SIO* ioctl call.
I will have a look on some BSD man pages on the net to clarify.

Regards,

Christian Prochnow


Am Donnerstag 12 Dezember 2002 16:18 schrieb David Sugar:
> This seems to be the only item I have left holding up the 1.0.8 release.
> It does seem FreeBSD does not have a ifr_netmask in ifreq.
>
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 address@hidden wrote:
> > Bugs item #652548, was opened at 2002-12-12 09:52
> > You can respond by visiting:
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101523&aid=652548&group
> >_id=1523
> >
> > Category: Bug Reporter
> > Group: None
> > Status: Open
> > Resolution: None
> > Priority: 5
> > Submitted By: Norbert Koch (nkoch)
> > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> > Summary: Compilation of network.cpp fails
> >
> > Initial Comment:
> > Hello.
> > I tried the latest cvs sources under FreeBSD 4.7.
> > Compilation fails in network.cpp because
> > the structure element ifr_netmask does not exist
> > under FreeBSD. As I understand the kernel
> > sources it should be replaced by ifr_addr.
> > See the enclosed diff file. It compiles but
> > I did not test so far if it works.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > You can respond by visiting:
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101523&aid=652548&group
> >_id=1523
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]