Re: OFFTOPIC: common C++ v ACE

[David Sugar]

I will comment only this far on this question; when Common C++ was still 
"APE", a lot of design decisions were made to make sure the library would be 
very small and modular, simply because at the time ACE was not and involved 
huge image overhead and I felt unessisary complexity to use.  If ACE had been 
appreciably smaller and more modular, it's likely APE would never have been 
written at that time nor Common C++ created later from it. 

On Monday 14 July 2003 04:34 pm, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> Dear list,
> I would like to ask your opinion about Common C++ and ACE.
> Which one is better now?
> Do they have the same functionality?
>
> TIA,
> Mihalis.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp