Re: OFFTOPIC: common C++ v ACE

[Mihalis I. Tsoukalos]

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:04:29AM -0400, David Sugar wrote:
> I will comment only this far on this question; when Common C++ was still 
> "APE", a lot of design decisions were made to make sure the library would be 
> very small and modular, simply because at the time ACE was not and involved 
> huge image overhead and I felt unessisary complexity to use.  If ACE had been 
> appreciably smaller and more modular, it's likely APE would never have been 
> written at that time nor Common C++ created later from it. 
> 
> On Monday 14 July 2003 04:34 pm, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> > Dear list,
> > I would like to ask your opinion about Common C++ and ACE.
> > Which one is better now?
> > Do they have the same functionality?
> >
> > TIA,
> > Mihalis.

So, are you suggesting that I better use Common C++ for
network programming because of the complexity of ACE?

What about bugs in those libraries?
What about active developers on each project? Which one is more
active?
Any other comments?

TIA,
Mihalis.