[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:09:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Ed Avis wrote:
> % mkdir -p fred/jim
> % chmod a-x fred/jim
> % rm -rf fred
> rm: cannot chdir from `fred' to `jim': Permission denied
But by the action of your chmod you have specifically requested that
you do not want those files removed! Therefore I for one will expect
that you will not be able to remove those files until you explicitly
allow it again with chmod. Changing this behavior would break a lot
of safety that has been built into scripts over the years.
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Ed Avis wrote:
> > In that case could I make a feature request for a new flag
> >
> > -F, --really-force
> > As --force but also change permissions if necessary.
>
> It's feasible.
> I'm not enthusiastic about this, but not strongly opposed either.
> Let's see if anyone else has strong opinions on the matter.
Adding a new option would not break any previously existing scripts.
So I agree that it is feasible. But I don't prefer it since its use
would not be portable systems which are standard but don't have this
extension.
<whine>
Since I work daily on GNU, HP-UX, AIX, etc. I am always running into
places where people use extensions in scripts which do not work on
other systems. (See my 'hostname -f' problem in previous postings.
How is setting my hostname to '-f' useful? :-/) Therefore the
addition of an option like this would only encourage people to use it!
And it would therefore generate more importable scripts which would
increase the workload of porters.
</whine>
Prompting the suggestion of:
> > -F, --really-force
> > As --force but also change permissions if necessary.
Please repeat after me. Standard is better than better. Instead of
the above why not use standard commands which will allow your script
to run on any standard system?
mkdir -p fred/jim
chmod a-x fred/jim
You obviously do not want the files removed. You have chmod'd them so
that they cannot be removed. Time passes. You now decide to allow
them to be removed. This works on any standard system.
chmod -R u+Xw fred
rm -rf fred
Bob
- rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/07
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/07
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories,
Bob Proulx <=
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Bob Proulx, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/09
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Bob Proulx, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/09