[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories
From: |
Ed Avis |
Subject: |
Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Nov 2003 11:30:04 +0000 (GMT) |
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Bob Proulx wrote:
[rm and unexecutable directories]
>>the other way is to chmod every file before doing anything with
>>it.
>But the directory containing the file would need the chmod, not the
>file itself.
Sorry - I meant to say chmod every directory before doing anything
with it, and by 'doing anything' I meant either removing it or
preparing to remove it.
--
Ed Avis <address@hidden>
- rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/07
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/07
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Bob Proulx, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Bob Proulx, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories,
Ed Avis <=
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Bob Proulx, 2003/11/08
- Re: rm -f and unexecutable directories, Ed Avis, 2003/11/09