Re: Clarification regarding linux command "ls".

[Matthew Woehlke]

sai nagendra bhavani prasad wrote:
> We found a scenario while testing "ls"
> command in linux (Linux  2.4.20-8 #1 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux).
> We got same results for "ls -la" and
> "ll",where as "ll" command is NOT found in the manual pages.

That shouldn't happen. Many systems create an alias 'll="ls -l"' (which 
is why it has no man page), but 'ls -l' != 'ls -la'. At the very minimum 
-la will show you also '.' and '..'.

> kindlly revert back ASAP.

Revert what? Is adding 'unalias ll' to your .profile what you want?

--
Matthew
find / -user your -name base -print | xargs chown us:us