Re: Clarification regarding linux command "ls".

[Bob Proulx]

sai nagendra bhavani prasad wrote:
> We found a scenario while testing "ls" command in linux (Linux
> 2.4.20-8 #1 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux).  We got same results for "ls
> -la" and "ll", where as "ll" command is NOT found in the manual
> pages.
>
> kindlly revert back ASAP.

Your reported generated discussion that you may read using the
following URL:

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-05/msg00117.html

The belief is that many software distributors provide a pre-existing
alias 'll="ls -l"'.  The 'll' command is not part of GNU coreutils.
(Although it is a traditionally included command for many Unix systems.)

Bob