[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name.
|
From: |
James Youngman |
|
Subject: |
Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:32:32 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:57:40PM +0100, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Trying to get findutils to build on cygwin, I needed to apply following
> patch. It now builds (and runs) fine for me.
[ change basename() to base_name() ]
Applied, thanks (with editor, not via "patch"). Forgot to add your
name in the ChangheLog entry, but you already appear in the THANKS
file.
Regards,
James.
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., (continued)
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., James Youngman, 2005/02/03
- Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/06
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/06
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/06
Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name.,
James Youngman <=