[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0
|
From: |
James Youngman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:28:35 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:16:20AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Recent version of the patch at
> https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3701
> plus patch at https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3723
> apparently fix both issues.
Many thanks.
I have applied as much of this patch as I can afford to while
remaining within the FSF guidelines which cover patches in the absense
of a copyright assignment. Once your copyright assignment paperwork
is complete, received etc., I will apply the rest of the patch.
Thanks again,
James.
- [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/02
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/02
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., James Youngman, 2005/02/03
- Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0,
James Youngman <=
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/06
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/06
Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., James Youngman, 2005/02/02