[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion for updatedb
|
From: |
leslie . polzer |
|
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion for updatedb |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 14:15:21 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) |
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:28:45AM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> This change makes a great deal of sense. Unfortunately, there are a
> number of difficulties with the idea. None of them are insuperable
> perhaps, but here they are:
Lots of what you said concerns locate. Is there any serious reason not
to ``sort -u | sort -f'' in *updatedb*?
Leslie
--
Personal homepage: https://viridian.dnsalias.net/~sky/homepage/
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83
pgpMBjQVoAY63.pgp
Description: PGP signature