|
| From: | James Youngman |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion for updatedb |
| Date: | Fri, 11 May 2007 14:14:13 +0100 |
On 5/11/07, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:28:45AM +0100, James Youngman wrote: > This change makes a great deal of sense. Unfortunately, there are a > number of difficulties with the idea. None of them are insuperable > perhaps, but here they are: Lots of what you said concerns locate. Is there any serious reason not to ``sort -u | sort -f'' in *updatedb*?
That would be fine, I think. James.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |