[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH] |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 05:38:23 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 23:48:05 +0100
> From: FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Of course the 141 vs 1 is no big deal. But if it comes for free, what about
> it ?
>
> By "for free" I mean an #ifdef appropriate to cover all of true unix.
> Something like
>
> #ifdef unix
> # define SIGPIPE_EXIT_CODE (128|SIGPIPE)
> #else
> # define SIGPIPE_EXIT_CODE 1
> #endif
This isn't guaranteed to produce 141 on every system, so you don't get
what you want except a small number of platforms.
AFAIK, Gawk attempts to provide a more or less portable environment,
and the above is against that goal.
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], (continued)
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/26