[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser)
From: |
Shigio YAMAGUCHI |
Subject: |
New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser) |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:40 +0900 |
Hi,
> Currently, opening multiple tag files with different mode at the same time
> (e.g. opening GRTAGS with GTAGS_CREATE while GTAGS is opened with
> GTAGS_MODIFY)
> is not allowed.
> If this restriction is removed, it becomes possible to make GRTAGS and GSYMS
> in incremental updating, and this problem will be solved.
Thank you for an additional investigation.
However, I think that you may always make all tag files.
When the cost to keep an old rule exceeds the merit, you had better
change the rule itself. New rule is like follows:
o All tag files (GPATH, GTAGS, GRTAGS, GSYMS) must exist even
if some of those are empty.
o The format of GRTAGS and GSYMS is always the same.
Things become simple by this rule,
Though command layer plug-in parser follows the old rule,
command layer itself will become a past relic in near future. :)
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden>
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
- Re: cost of popen(), (continued)
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/13
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/13
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/14
- [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/16
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/17
- New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser),
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <=
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/20
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/20
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/25
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/25
- Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/18
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/19
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/19
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/19
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/20
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/17