[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:57:07 -0700 |
> which window gets deleted: The one showing the buffer whose
> window shall be fit (in which case it would be interesting to know
> whether the window shall be shrunk or enlarged), or another window.
I thought I made it clear that another window is deleted from the window being
fit:
"I want that window to fit its buffer as much as possible,
but without deleting any other windows."
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, (continued)
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/14
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer,
Drew Adams <=