|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#20322: 25.0.50; indent-tabs-mode should default to nil |
Date: | Tue, 14 Apr 2015 23:24:54 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0 |
On 04/14/2015 06:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Then by all means let's fix those modes whose defaults aren't.
So, most of them? Like I said, in the end that would call for the change of the default value. In the meantime, should we have an xxx-indent-tabs-mode variable per major mode?
Here's some statistics: http://sideeffect.kr/popularconvention/#java (you can click on the language names), sources at https://github.com/outsideris/popularconvention
I understand that C (and, to lesser extent, C++) have a lot of history, and a lot of variance in their communities.
But the only semi-official style guide I could find that advises to use tabs in the Linux kernel one: http://www.maultech.com/chrislott/resources/cstyle/LinuxKernelCodingStyle.txt
The GNU coding style, to the best of my understanding, does not mention tabs at all.
The vast majority of people I work with use tabs, FWIW.
Do they use 8-column offsets, then?
Even folks who want tabs have to configure stuff, because of our `tab-width' default (which is indeed something we cannot change now): http://stackoverflow.com/a/21788651/615245Our tab-width default is simply the default tab width everywhere.
I'm not sure what you mean by that, but my point was, the defaults are not suitable as-is (even) for a certain part of our users that use tabs.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |