[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21472: 25.0.50; REGRESSION: (emacs) `Coding Systems' uses curly quot
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#21472: 25.0.50; REGRESSION: (emacs) `Coding Systems' uses curly quotes for Lisp strings |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:51:25 -0700 (PDT) |
> > The point of this bug is that those *particular* terms do
> > not belong between curly double-quotes (IMHO).
>
> Yes, they do.
Why? Why are we quoting "unix" and "dos"? Why not quote "UNIX"
and "DOS"? What is the reasoning behind this? Apparently these
are not literal programming strings - or if they are, it's not
clear how they are used as strings.
> > If they were ordinary text being quoted then they would be (should
> > be) capitalized - "unix", "dos", etc. are written incorrectly for
> > such a usage.
>
> Quoted text in Info manuals ends up with curly quotes when you use
> Texinfo 5.x and later.
How does that respond to the cited sentence it follows?
Quoted text might end up with curly quotes. The question is
why these words should be quoted (using ordinary text quotes),
and if they should (no reason given so far) then why they
should be lowercase.
bug#21472: 25.0.50; REGRESSION: (emacs) `Coding Systems' uses curly quotes for Lisp strings, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/14
bug#21472: 25.0.50; REGRESSION: (emacs) `Coding Systems' uses curly quotes for Lisp strings, Paul Eggert, 2015/09/15
bug#21472: 25.0.50; REGRESSION: (emacs) `Coding Systems' uses curly quotes for Lisp strings, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/15